Darwin's beliefs.
Charles Robert Darwin Author of ” On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life”, published on 24 November 1859. A work of scientific fiction, which became the basis for the modern lies about evolution.
Now this is where people start scratching there heads. The title of Darwins book is not advertised in full, nor the history of horrible racism that went with it. Darwin himself was a avowed racist, which is evident by the title of his book. He believed the “negro” was inferior to the white man. If you have a inquisitive mind, don’t take my word for it.
Deoxyribonucleic acid
Now lets dive into the proof that evolution has run its course and needs to be thrown out of all media and schools. DNA Is one of the most sophisticated systems on earth. It codes for every aspect of every animal and creature on earth. From bacteria to humans, and everything in between.
Now the Law of information ( A irrefutable scientific law) states that all information must have a creator. This is no different than the computer your using requires a code to make the system work. Simply put in order for DNA to exist it must have been created. It is more complex than our binary code system and has a greater storage capacity than any human system.
The law of bio-genesis, another scientific law states that you cannot get live animals from inanimate objects. For example you cannot get a chicken from a rock. This law also refutes the claims of evolutionary proponents who claim nothing exploded into everything.
Now I am not telling you that you have to change your world view. I am stating that if you are like me and want to know the truth and abide by it. Then you may have to examine your own world view.
Is evolution possible?
One semi-final blow to make sure evolution does not get up, statistics. The mathematical limit for what is possible is 1*10^70, what are the chances that life evolved? 1*10^350 it is easy to see which number is bigger. In simpler terms evolution is beyond what is possible. You have a better chance of winning the lottery every day for the next 100 years than evolution being true.
Radiometric Dating?
Yet lava flows that have occurred in the present have been tested soon after they erupted, and they invariably contained much more argon-40 than expected.1 For example, when a sample of the lava in the Mt. St. Helens crater (that had been observed to form and cool in 1986) (Figure 1) was analyzed in 1996, it contained so much argon-40 that it had a calculated “age” of 350,000 years!2 Similarly, lava flows on the sides of Mt. Ngauruhoe, New Zealand (Figure 2), known to be less than 50 years old, yielded “ages” of up to 3.5 million years.3 https://answersingenesis.org/geology/radiometric-dating/radiometric-dating-problems-with-the-assumptions/
We have all been taught that radiometric dating proves the age of the earth. The problem with this unfounded assertion is that before we even bothered to test the method we declared it accurate and began teaching about it and why it should be trusted. So what happened when we did get around to actually verifying this method? Well the above example is par for the course. Every time we try any radiometric method on objects with known dates we never get a accurate result. As in the above example, we can see that this method naturally will yield millions and billions of years so long as we assume how much parent element was present when the rocks cooled, (but modern test prove daughter elements likely already were present in rock formations). We also assume that the decay rate was constant without ever being able to measure it or test it. The last assumption is no contamination, meaning that water or molten rocks never interacted with tested samples. Now if we could prove all the assumptions then we would have a valid scientific theory.
The obvious problem is that we cannot (unless some one invents a time machine) go back and test these assumptions in order to validate them. This leaves us with the logical conclusion, science is about what we can see, hear, touch, smell and taste. Science is about repeatable experiments, with results that prove a theory. But as always don’t take my word for it, do your own research. The Bible is also a historical text used by secular and non-secular scholars alike. If the Bible can be used by historians than scientists should not be afraid to use it as well
5 thoughts on “Evolution debunked.”
Comments are closed.